The following great peripherals war is being waged over your ears. After every company on this planet put out a gaming mouse and then a mechanical keyboard, now it’s time for headsets. So gaming headset.
We understand you don’t wish to scroll through each and every headset review when all you need is an easy answer: “What’s the best gaming headset I will buy with my hard-earned dollars?” This page supports the answer you seek, regardless of what your budget is.
We’ll keep updating our recommendations as we have a look at new items and locate stronger contenders. For this latest update, we’ve reviewed a couple of fancypants models, namely the Sennheiser Game Zero and and Sennheiser GSP 350, and the Audio-Technica ATH-AG1X. For further earthly budgets, we’ve also tested the SteelSeries Arctis 7, the HyperX Cloud Revolver S, along with the Logitech G533, which debuts as our new best mid-range wireless headset.
Kingston doesn’t have similar pedigree from the headset space as the competitors, nevertheless the HyperX Cloud is a winning device with a cheap price.
Our 2016 headset recommendation remains virtually exactly like our 2015 headset recommendation (and our 2014, as an example): The Kingston HyperX Cloud. Or, if you’re feeling a little fancier, the Cloud II. It’s comfortable, it may sound great, and (on top of that) it’s comparatively cheap. What else could you want in a headset?
True to its name, the HyperX Cloud is one of the most comfortable headsets out there. It’s hefty, with a solid-metal construction that belies its cheap price, but sits feather-light in the head. The faux-leather earpieces are generously padded, oversized, and form a great seal without squeezing way too hard.
And it also sounds excellent. As I said inside our review, this isn’t a studio-quality group of headphones. It’s got the standard gaming-centric bass boost and a slick top end, but both of these are subtle enough how the HyperX Cloud competes favorably with laptop headphone twice its price. There’s no Kingston-provided way to adjust the sound, considering the fact that the HyperX Cloud connects through standard 3.5mm jacks, nevertheless, you honestly shouldn’t must tweak it at all out from the box. It sounds pretty damn great.
The only real negative thing is the microphone. It’s very flexible, that i appreciate, but has an inclination to grab background noise and plosives while leaving your voice nasally and hollow.
The slightly-more-expensive HyperX Cloud II is, I feel, more a lateral move than a noticable difference over its predecessor. It swaps the 3.5mm connection for a 7.1-ready USB soundcard with better in-line controls and a certain amount of noise cancellation in the microphone, however, you wouldn’t notice a massive distinction between both iterations and I’m uncertain the increase in cost is worth it.
Regardless, either model is a great option for a gaming headset. Within an increasingly crowded market, the HyperX Cloud nails basically every major category with few significant compromises. I hope the following model improves in the microphone, however, for $80 it’s a steal.
The Cloud Stinger provides solid sound, serious comfort, along with an attractive design for anybody who just demands a “good enough” headset without any wallet-shock.
HyperX’s Cloud headset is still the most popular, however the company undercut themselves a little by releasing the HyperX Cloud Stinger. Listed at $50, it’s one of several cheapest gaming headsets I’ve experienced from your reputable brand. And it’s good.
Sure, it’s not quite as effective as the initial Cloud, but for lots of people the Stinger ought to do just fine. The plastic chassis lacks some of the original Cloud’s panache and durability, but looks high-end from a distance and sits pretty slim in the head. HyperX also solved the Cloud’s biggest issue lastly put a volume slider straight on the bottom of your right earcup and gave it a flip-to-mute microphone, so forget about fiddling with in-line controls.
As for the audio, the Cloud Stinger’s got a great mid-range with hardly any distortion even at high volumes. The treble is a little underpowered and also the bass range is practically nonexistent, but eighty percent of any given game, film, or song will come through clear and clean.
If you already possess a decent headset, especially the original Cloud, I wouldn’t say the Stinger is a must-own. However if you’re looking for the best excellent value on entry-level hardware, this is it. It’s an insane bargain when you compare it with other headsets from the same price tier.
At just under $100, Corsair’s Void Wireless is mainly a good wireless headset, but you will encounter some compromises.
Frankly speaking, Corsair doesn’t have any competition with this category. Most decent wireless gaming headsets will run you $150 or more. Corsair’s Void Wireless is priced in a mere $100, which leaves it on its lonesome.
But even comprising that vacuum, it’s pretty decent. Not phenomenal, mind you, but at the price you’re getting a bargain.
I wasn’t really sure what you should make in the Void’s weird, diamond-shaped ear cups but after a little use I’m actually pretty pleased. The Void Wireless sits a little forward on the head, with the band resting just above your forehead. It requires some getting used to, but the end result is less tension around the jaw and much more on the back of the pinnacle where it’s less noticeable. I wouldn’t say it’s as comfortable as the classical HyperX Cloud, but undeniably I love it more than its predecessor, the H2100.
The on-headset controls are fairly intuitive, by using a volume rocker at the base from the left ear, plus oversized buttons for power and mute about the side. And it’s got 16.8 million color RGB lighting, if that’s your bag.
The greatest design issue is the Void Wireless is heavy. It’s not an issue when sitting up, however, if you appear down or search for the headset has a tendency to slide around. I don’t know whether it’s due to the battery or perhaps the metal-augmented construction, yet your neck turns into a workout with this headset.
Sound-wise, the Void Wireless still needs some work. It sounds passable, especially while gaming, but throwing on some music sets the Void Wireless’s limitations into stark relief. The low-end is muddy and distorted, as well as the whole selection of mid-to-high-end frequencies sounds slick, like you’ve applied excessive compression.
You are able to adjust the headset’s sound in Corsair’s software, but Corsair’s software package is still a lttle bit unwieldy. Much better than a year ago, I think, but nonetheless not on par with Razer, SteelSeries, or Logitech. Also, many folks have reported issues with firmware updates-not a great sign.
“This doesn’t appear to be a very positive review,” you might say. And you’re right, it’s not. The Void Wireless is just not an unbelievable headset, as mentioned up top. However it is the best wireless gaming headset under $150, and given how many wires are connected to my PC at any moment, the benefit of cheap wireless could be worth sacrificing a little bit of quality of sound.
Logitech’s G533 doesn’t have quite a similar breadth of options because the G933, but a far more restrained design along with a bargain price turn this into a robust contender for best wireless headset.
It’s a tricky call replacing our former mid-tier wireless pick, the Logitech G933, with its sibling-successor the Logitech G533. Like, really tough. The G933 is a great headset, with crisp and well-balanced audio as well as some nifty design features (like having the capacity to store the USB dongle inside an earcup).
But I’m still replacing it. Why? Well, aesthetics can be a huge reason. If you need an indicator how Logitech’s design language has shifted previously year or more, your search is over gam1ngheadset the G933 and G533. The G933 was all sharp angles and science fiction. The G533 alternatively is sleek, professional, restrained. Having a piano-black finish and soft curves, it seems such as a headset created by Audio-Technica or Sennheiser or even a more mainstream audio company-not necessarily a “gaming” headset. I enjoy it.
The G533’s design is also functional. The microphone isn’t as hidden as I’d like, but that’s the sole flaw. The headset is lightweight, durable, and less vise-grip tight than its predecessor.
As for audio fidelity? It’s not quite equivalent to the G933, nevertheless the differences are minimal. The G533 lacks a little bit of oomph, especially at lower volumes, as well as its 7.1 support is subpar. Those are hardly reasons to stay away, though-a lot of people will run the headset loud enough to counteract the headset’s absence of presence, and virtual 7.1 is (in my view) basically always bad. The G533 is worse compared to the average, but the average remains to be something I choose to avoid daily.
In any event, the G933 remains to be being sold and is an absolutely sensible choice for some, particularly if you want console support. The G533 is PC-only, while the G933 might be attached by 3.5mm cable with other devices. And when you value comfort over audio fidelity, take a look at the SteelSeries Arctis 7 too-one more great choice.
Astro’s new A50 touts a whole new charging station and better controls, yet still doesn’t put out the audio you may expect from the $300 set of headphones.
SteelSeries Siberia 800 Wireless Dolby 7.1 Gaming Headset
Right after a new generation of your game earphone and Siberia 800 released in 2016, I assumed we might finally break the tie that’s dominated our splurge headset pick over the past number of years.
But once again, there’s no clear winner in that $300 price-though Astro certainly made some strides toward edging out SteelSeries.
The latest A50’s biggest improvement will be the battery. The newest model overcomes an extensive-running weak spot and packs in 12 to 15 hours of life-enough to obtain through also a long day of gaming. Even better, it features gyroscopes in the ears that give it time to detect whether you’ve set it up down. It automatically shuts off ten seconds later in that case, then turns back and connects to your PC on as soon as you pick it back. Its base station also serves as a charger, a nice blend of function and sweetness.